"The General Secretariat of the Assembly requested the V.Excia the availability of a protocol car, brand Mercedes Benz S500, armored, to his Excellency the President of the Assembly of the Republic," it reads.
It was hoped, however, greater restraint in spending designed to give comfort to the President of RA. Because, at the beginning of this year, the Standing Committee of Parliament came to give a press conference to announce austerity.It is not, however, an expense than expected. It's a car that the President of RA is entitled by virtue of functions. But it is something that goes against the prevailing discourse, especially at a time when the Mozambicans face extreme difficulties in relation to public transport.
A report from Truth last week, realized the drama facing the residents of Marracuene.
A simulation of the impact of transportation costs for residents of that populous district found that a person spends 40 meticais per day. And at the end of the month spent something like 1200 meticais. Not to mention, for those who have, with transport costs generated by the school children.Currently, most of the neighborhoods of Maputo is struggling with the same problem: lack of transport. However, on the other hand the heads travel in comfort.
The purchase of vehicles should be phased manner, according to the speaker, the financial difficulties the country is experiencing. That is, the state is unable to pay the amount required to purchase, at one time, 250 vehicles for an equal number of deputies.
After the article published in the Savannah (first independent weekly) - titled "Deputies luxury", which said the state invested in full time of austerity, 304,805,827 meticais in the circulating medium for Members 'oversee' the Executive - triggered a heated debate on social networks, especially Facebook and Twitter.Political analyst William Egidio Vaz Raposo argues that the deputies are entitled to such benefits. These perks, he says, should not scare anyone. Incidentally, "are a pittance compared with others in the region and beyond: compared to other management positions in which one need not be elected," he says.
Fox goes further and says there's a big difference between perks of ministers (unelected people) and deputies (elected officials), the difference between deputies and chairmen of councils of administration (PCA) of public companies or the difference between the allocated budget for maintenance, lubrication and fuel the cars of the Presidency with the budget for the purchase of cars for Members.Other users claiming to oppose change of mentality. Because, says Scott Nelson: "They were elected to serve and not to be served! They should have the same rights and as any other citizen (...) It is easy to raise taxes and hold harmless the other for himself. " That is, "should use their own income to consumption and investment (house, car, etc.)."The journalist Emídio Beula, author of the play that sparked the debate, said that "the prerogative given to members to choose a car to your liking deserves our concern. "Justified" Members are more exposed to criticism precisely because they are our MPs: ie are they who shall inspect the Executive. When they begin to externalize despesismo typical signs of the executive and that should merit their interpellation believe that we should not be silent. "Edmundo Galiza Matos Junior was the only deputy who joined the debate. The patient reported that "there is a budget that was approved by the Government which includes a vehicle for the deputy justify its presence in the electorate during the five years of his term." But, "never or little is said of the hundreds of cars in ministries , provincial, district and national. "
0 comentários:
Post a Comment