Some of Mozambique’s creditors, far from
accepting the government’s offer to renegotiate unpayable debts, are claiming
that the government played foul when it defaulted on an interest payment of
almost 60 million US dollars last week.The complaints come from creditors who
purchased bonds initially issued by the Mozambique Tuna Company (Ematum) in
2013. The bonds were for 850 million US dollars, and were issued via European
banks, notably Credit Suisse and VTB of Russia. The bonds were snapped up by investors who asked no questions about the ability
of Ematum, a new and untested company, to repay. The bonds came with a
Mozambican government guarantee, and nobody asked whether this guarantee was
valid.
In fact, if Credit Suisse and VTB had done any due diligence they would have
discovered at once that the government guarantee was illegal. A parliamentary
commission of inquiry, which reported last November, pointed out that the
guarantee violated the budget laws (of 2013 and 2014), and the Mozambican
Constitution (which says that it is the exclusive power of the country’s
parliament, the Assembly of the Republic, to authorize the government “to
contract or grant loans, to make other credit operations, and to establish the
ceiling for state guarantees”.)The original repayment terms on the bonds were
extremely tough – the money was to be repaid over seven years, with a two year
grace period, and at an interest rate of LIBOR (London Inter-Bank Offered Rate)
plus 6.5 per cent.
It was soon clear that Ematum was quite incapable of
repaying anything, and so the burden fell on the government. The Ematum bonds
were converted into sovereign government bonds with a longer repayment time,
but at a higher interest rate, under a deal reached with bondholders in April
2016. What remained of the Ematum bonds were swapped for government bonds
maturing in 2023. The interest rate, however, shot up to 10.5 per cent.But
Ematum was just one of three quasi-state companies which, on the basis of
illicit government guarantees, had borrowed huge sums of money, mostly from
Credit Suisse and VTB. The previous Mozambican government, headed by President
Armando Guebuza, had kept the other loans, to the security-related companies
Proindicus and MAM, secret, and they amounted to over 1.1 billion dollars. None
of the companies was making any profits, and the state had no money to make the
payments on schedule.The government alerted the creditors to the country’s financial situation in
October, and urged them to renegotiate.
But apparently the bondholders did not
believe the government. Cited by the Bloomberg news service, Charles Blitzer, a
Washington-based consultant who is advising the majority of the bondholders,
insisted, against all the evidence, that the government can pay.
“The non-payment of Wednesday was a strategic default and was not driven by the inability to make the payment,” said Blitzer. “This strategy we think is not conducive to moving forward, not just with us but more broadly. It’s not conducive to restoring confidence from future lenders and investors.”The International Monetary Fund (IMF) disagrees with Blitzer. The IMF resident representative in Maputo, Ari Aisen, pointed out last Thursday that there was nothing surprising about the default on the interest payment. “The government’s position seems to be consistent from the start, when the Minister Economy and Finance Minister Adriano Maleiane) went to London and indicated the fiscal difficulties the country is facing”, he said. “So it seems natural that Mozambique has not been able to make this payment”.
“The non-payment of Wednesday was a strategic default and was not driven by the inability to make the payment,” said Blitzer. “This strategy we think is not conducive to moving forward, not just with us but more broadly. It’s not conducive to restoring confidence from future lenders and investors.”The International Monetary Fund (IMF) disagrees with Blitzer. The IMF resident representative in Maputo, Ari Aisen, pointed out last Thursday that there was nothing surprising about the default on the interest payment. “The government’s position seems to be consistent from the start, when the Minister Economy and Finance Minister Adriano Maleiane) went to London and indicated the fiscal difficulties the country is facing”, he said. “So it seems natural that Mozambique has not been able to make this payment”.
At the London meeting with creditors on 25 October, Maleiane had indicated in
great detail the financial crisis facing the country, and why it will be
impossible to pay anything to the Ematum, Proindicus and MAM creditors at any
time in 2017.But instead of working on a renegotiation, the bondholders have
dug their heels in and insisted on payment. Blitzer did tell Bloomberg
that the bondholders would be willing to hold “preliminary talks”, if the
government approaches them. But the government has appointed advisers to deal
with the creditors. They are the London law firm White and Case and the
financial advisory and asset management firm, Lazard Freres.In a statement
issued a week ago, the Ministry of Economy and Finance urged the bondholders to
liaise with Lazard Freres and White and Case to establish “a constructive and
collaborative dialogue”. According to the Bloomberg report, the
bondholders will not talk about debt restructuring until the independent audit
of Ematum, Proindicus and MAM is published, and until Mozambique reaches a new
programme with the IMF.But the IMF has already made it clear that no new
programme is possible until Mozambique brings its debt down to sustainable
levels, and that will only be possible through debt restructuring.Hence the
longer the creditors refuse to talk about restructuring, the longer they will
have to wait to receive any payment at all.Meanwhile pressure is building up
from Mozambican civil society, backed up by supporters abroad, to declare the
three loans as null and void, because of the illegality of the government
guarantees.
0 comentários:
Post a Comment