Wednesday, October 15, 2014

RENAMO DESTROYS BALLOT PAPERS IN TETE



Supporters of the former rebel movement Renamo destroyed ballot papers on Wednesday morning in polling stations located in three schools in Tsangano district in the western Mozambican province of Tete, according to a report in the “Mozambican Political Process Bulletin”, published by AWEPA (European Parliamentarians for Africa), and by the anti-corruption NGO CIP (Centre for Public Integrity).The Bulletin’s correspondent gives a completely different account of this event from that in the anti-government newsheet “CanalMoz”, which claimed that Renamo was preventing electoral fraud, and that it was members of the public who set fire to suspect ballot boxes and the votes they contained.The Bulletin said the excuse for the violence was a claim that ballot boxes had been kept in the homes of community leaders, where they had been stuffed with votes for the ruling Frelimo Party.This ought to be impossible, because, before voting begins, the ballot boxes are opened and shown to monitors of the political parties, and any observers and journalists present, precisely to show that they are empty. They are then resealed and voting commences.
During the clashes between the Renamo supporters and the police two people were injured in one of the schools, and 11 arrests were made. One policeman fled from his post, abandoning his AK-47 rifle, which was then seized by Renamo members. Voting was interrupted, and the three schools were completely abandoned. The Bulletin added that something similar happened at a school in Moatize district, on the boundary with Tsangano, but gave no details.
In the northern coastal town of Angoche, voting was able to begin in 10 polling stations which had the wrong electoral registers. The Electoral Administration Technical Secretariat (STAE) found that the registers had been sent to the wrong school. STAE was able to recover them and sent them to the correct stations.Little by little, the polling stations in Beira which failed to open on time began opening their doors to voters in the early afternoon. Thus the polling stations located at the Massange Primary School began to operate at about 13.20 – almost six and a half hours after they should have opened. In one polling station, at the 12 October school, voting only began at 14.30.One strange phenomenon reported in a few areas is polling stations without voters. Five polling stations in the northern city of Cuamba, and seven in Manica town, in the centre of the country, opened but nobody was voting. The most likely explanation is that these stations are not in the same places as the voter registration posts, and nobody told the voters of the switch.

ELECTIONS 2014



Encontrados boletins de voto a favor da FrelimoSeventeen ballots were found in Polling Station number 04038101 located in the Primary School and Complete Coalane in Quelimane. They were already marked the check box of the Frelimo candidate, clearly giving a show that Nyusi and Frelimo were voted. Bulletins came in the same batch nr 06173371 06173475.A the discovery happened around 16hours via a Chairman of the Board. Coincidence or not, in all bulletins can see a small dot in the square Frelimo and its partido.O act created panic among the opposition parties gifts right away tried to communicate the media reporter for the subject. side of the Technical Secretariat for Electoral Administration, STAE, no one spoke until the close of this report. Remember that Coalane is where the council voted President of Quelimane, had as its bastion. (DIARY OF ZAMBEZIA)

News: elections first hours Mozambique


They arrested four members of Renamo in Tsangano district, Tete Province, for having prevented the entry of the ballot room with votes already voted in favor of the Frelimo party and candidate. When the delegates realized Renamo demanded explanation to the chairman but, this tried to call the police, who arrested the Renamo delegates. Meanwhile, Renamo members were taken away by police more polls with votes entered into the room. The population saw when fraud, tried to grab the ballot box and burned them. The police had to return and is currently shooting the population. At this time, the vote was interrupted. Tsangano and Changara are satellites of fraud Frelimo. In the last general elections, Guebuza won in all the tables, but the number of votes exceeded the number of voters. Ie: there was ballot box stuffing.  In Beira,Sofala Province, a citizen was found over six polls populous neighborhood of Munhava. The Head of Operations of STAE says he does not know the citizen and that it should not be there. The citizen escaped a lynching. Such citizen, who was accompanied by a woman who fled, says he was sent by the Director of STAE to transport the ballot boxes. The population requires measures to "transporter polls" .However, clandestine urns were found in the car of a police officer in Quelimane, capital of the Province of Zambezia with the registration plate PRM 00313.Interpelados the population, the police handed the polls two foreign citizens that transported in two cars containing the plate ACU enrolls 173 MC 481 and MC ADJ. (Sources: Youth Parliament and Canalmoz)

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Mozambique: this election changes everything

Like a drug dealer dishing out a free fix, the battered Nissan Sunny parked in a shady corner of the park attracted a steady stream of people from all walks of life: students, security guards, street vendors, smartly-dressed professionals and even the odd homeless person. They all approached empty handed, and left clutching packages that The Chief – that’s how he introduced himself, at least – was distributing from the boot of his car.
It didn’t take long to figure out that it wasn’t actual narcotics being distributed in public, here in the shadow of the shiny new foreign ministry building (Chinese-built, of course) in Maputo’s bustling government district. It was t-shirts: bright red numbers with the face of Filipe Nyusi, the ruling party’s candidate for president in Wednesday’s election, printed larger-than-life size and in unforgivingly high resolution on the front.
If you have spent any time in Mozambique over the last couple of months, then his is a face you don’t forget easily. Not that it is particularly distinctive, or even flattering: the official portrait was taken from below, which only emphasises Nyusi’s fleshy jowls and gives him a vaguely decadent, venal air – unfortunate adjectives to attach to any presidential candidate, but particularly so in Mozambique when the gap between rich and poor is already so large and so obvious.
Nonetheless, his face – along with Frelimo’s distinctive red and green logo – is just everywhere. On those ubiquitous t-shirts, and billboards; on shopping bags and car bonnets; and on every inch of unoccupied wall space. If you didn’t know any better, you’d think that there was no one else in this race except Nyusi and Frelimo.
That’s certainly what The Chief thinks. “This is our man,” he said, proudly wearing his own merchandise. “Those others, they are small boys. We are not worried.”
The Chief, however, is wrong. No party other than Frelimo has ever ruled an independent Mozambique, and none has even come close before. But this time is different. Frelimo are worried, and the opposition are coming of age. An upset may not be likely, but it is certainly on the cards – hence the massive and enormously expensive PR campaign, planned for the most part by the same Brazilian firm that masterminded elections wins for Dilma Roussef and Lula.
The obvious threat comes from the old enemy, Renamo. It’s all too easy to dismiss Renamo as a spent force, as a bunch of suited rebels angling for a few more big pay days, and the events of the last couple of years lend themselves to this interpretation. By pulling out of the political process and returning to his remote bush hideout, Renamo leader Afonso Dhlakama seemed to be trying to relive his civil war glory days when he was powerful and his party was relevant (even if its funding then did come from Apartheid South Africa). And he got what he wanted: important concessions from the government that gave Renamo members more representation and, allegedly, more access to economic opportunities.
This analysis ignores one inconvenient truth, however, which is Dhlakama’s sheer popularity. He has been mobbed wherever he has campaigned since emerging from the bush last month, drawing huge, adoring crowds that aren’t just there for the free t-shirt and pop concert (key crowd-pullers at Frelimo rallies). And he is saying all the right things too, pushing a message of reform and reconciliation, and pledging to separate state and party interests. He even promised Frelimo members that there would be space for them in his government. Somehow, Dhlakama has turned himself from a rebel into a visionary, and his lofty rhetoric is showing up the ruling party’s petty sniping.
Then there’s the Movimento Democrático de Moçambique (MDM), the new kids on the opposition bloc. It already runs the local governments of three out of four of the country’s biggest cities, and is enormously popular in Maputo too. Its message of clean, efficient governance aimed at bridging that wealth gap has resonated among urban youth in particular, and this core constituency will only get bigger with every new election. Unlike Renamo’s Dhlakama, MDM leader Daviz Simango has a long and well-respected track record in government as mayor of Beira (at first under on a Renamo ticket, incidentally), so has the experience to back up his criticisms of the current administration.
Between the two of them, Renamo and MDM have the potential to chip away at Frelimo’s majority. Frelimo, remember, is desperately hoping to avoid dipping under 50% in the first round of voting, because that would force a run-off election that would force the opposition to unite behind a single candidate. Although notoriously unreliable, some opinion polls here have suggested that this is a viable outcome.
But even if Frelimo wins the presidential election outright, it will still find itself leading a very different kind of government. Also on Wednesday are elections for Mozambique’s parliament, the Assembly of the Republic, and both Renamo and MDM are likely to significantly increase their representation. This means that Frelimo will face real legislative opposition for the first time in its decades-long rule. Hopefully, this will force compromise and greater accountability, and ensure that new laws benefit the country as a whole.
Whatever happens, it is abundantly clear that Frelimo can no longer run Mozambique as a de facto one-party state – and no amount of free t-shirts is going to change this fact. Not that Nyusi and co. can be written off just yet. Like it or not, the country’s immediate future is still in the ruling party's hands, and will be determined by how gracefully it adjusts to its new reality. (Daily Mavericky)

I will vote

This is the last of Whittle Sickle before the elections .15 October, probably the former, since Independence, where there is a real chance for change. Especially because all the candidates for president have focused their campaigns on the need for change in the country. And if this kind of speech was expected in the opposition candidates (wanting to change is what oppositions always intended ...) have the same surprises the candidate of continuity. The candidate who defends the party flag long in power. This phenomenon can be explained only with the realization that everyone has, that the country is deeply unhappy with the way it has been ruled. The country is fed up with rampant corruption and impunity, Justice subservient to power, the plunder of national wealth by a minority, organized with strong political roots within the crime boss. And all of the Nyusi, Simango, passing Dhlakama realize this and seek to take dividends for 15 days already missing a few days to know whom is that the electorate is to believe. And I think the calming should be running out in pharmacies, as we all know are not outward appearances, from the cap to capulana, since the presence in rallies and marches to the campaigns door-to-door, which will tell you when each voter is with a pen in hand instead of voting. There will tell what he really believes in his heart. Because you know that if you vote wrong, if too many people vote wrong, the consequences will be felt by us all. In his statements ensure that the three candidates have won. But in Ponta Vermelha, there is only one chair and there will be two that will not fit there. The same about the parties and their struggle to fill seats in parliament. All these years we have had governments and majorities in the Assembly led by the same party. That Parliament served for little more than to stamp the Government's proposals. This time there is the real possibility of having a government of a party that does not have a majority in parliament and therefore have to go negotiate with other parliamentary parties to pass laws. For all this I advise the reader not to let go vote. Vote is not going to give up a right that we all have to choose who will govern us for the next five years. Go further, advising you not vote blank or invalid vote. We should not be ashamed or afraid to vote for whoever our conscience tells us what is best for contry.Ou if we are pessimistic, the less bad.I will vote. Hope we meet there. ...
(Machado da Graça in SAVANA in The Whittle DE SICKLE)

Fatalism, responsibility and moral luck

Life is about choices. Some good, some bad, many so-so. Voting in elections is part of the choices we make in our lives. There are two attitudes that influence how we make our choices. One is the idea that the world is too big to be influenced by us. Or another, we are too small to influence the course of things. The other is the idea that we make our choices based on experience. The electoral vote can not be influenced by the first way because it is fatalistic. The vote counts, but only the vote that is done consciously. Just imagine the bridge Katembe ready and imagine yourself jumping from up there in the middle and ask if it was a good idea or not to jump. Too late. This is the fatalistic vote. It is unfortunately the message that many people tried to pass along the campaign trail. Vote in opposition, no matter what their program and suitability, everything is better than the current arrogance. Or, vote in continuity, no matter your schedule and suitability, everything is better than the unknown.
No way out of this false dilemma. It is the conscious vote. Only this conscious vote will require a lot of us, above all reasoning. Will be necessary to think very carefully before voting. Fortunately I can help it. Notice, however, that my help is biased. I am the current government and its candidate. This will transpire this "help". But the base to vote for the opposition if my reasons are not convincing will. Therefore, the help is biased, but the game is clean. Who continues to read and is a supporter of the opposition does so at their own risk. Who ever decided to vote for continuity is better not continue to read not to change your mind. The reading will be more profitable for the enlightened undecided and critical capacity. It is for that vast majority of writing.
I need to clarify two major misconceptions before entering the subject properly. The first misconception concerns the change of government. Some say that you can not change the government because the opposition has no experience in government and will put the country upside down. This is a voting case, therefore, of little use. Even the direction of the central market of Maputo could form a government without major problems. If you have sense of responsibility that weighs on it will know to look the best advice especially as the main guarantor of continuity is the state apparatus, which, in principle, is nonpartisan. This works even better if the state apparatus is functional. Ours is not, but there are several ways to put it to work. If you work or not, that is another matter. Moreover, these days much of what makes a good or bad governance has little impact on the success, or failure, of the same governance.
The only difference between an experienced government but disoriented, and a potential government without experience is that the probability of making the same mistakes, or worse, is greater in the latter in order to give the vote to the latter is, and will always , a risky action. The problem here does not arise in terms of the country. Mozambique will not disappear from the map just because an experienced government directs their destinations. The risks are the individual level. Many choose the new in the hope that your life improves when an election what really counts is not to lose what one has, or ever could. This risk is especially higher among those who have nothing (come on, young people without jobs or housing) who must rely on the prospect of having to once again be in the rear on the waiting list for a better life simply because the young have their preferred and need to feed them. Or the old need to continue to meet who provided services. Here the question is to decide which is the longest list.
Another misconception concerns the alternation. Which is part of the democratic game and this is true it is said. But that does not mean it has to be done mechanically. The alternation is only a possibility in a democratic system. It is, in fact, their existence as potentiality that gives strength to democracy. It is a kind of "joker". I lived 19 years in a one-party state in Germany (I mean the state of Bavaria, whose capital is Munich) where all that time (and in the previous 30 years) has been in power only one party. Even now continues the same party in power, albeit in coalition with a minority partner. The problems that are associated with Frelimo - arrogance, partisanship of the state, corruption, opportunism youth who join the party as a means of social mobility - are present in Bavaria. Bavaria is one of the wealthiest states of Germany despite all these problems. It can be said, of course, Mozambique, with Frelimo, was not rich, but this is a difficult political argument to rebut (not because it is not possible, but because while there are people dying of hunger, not have housing or employment will always be easy to say that a government does nothing). I repeat: change for change is not part of the democratic game. Change to change, yes. But as I will show later, the continuity can also be change. I will also suggest that the key ingredient to the success of Bavaria (and Scandinavia also had domination by a single party for a long time) was responsible citizenship and critical, yet something that we lack in Mozambique.
There are two problems that seem relevant: the problem of "status quo" and the problem of individual responsibility. The conscious vote constitutes the tension between these two problems. The problem of "status quo" is easy to treat.
Normally, people do not want to change (eg, electing another government) because they are afraid of the unknown. This has been one of the biggest fears that supporters of the current government try to instill people. In English there is even a term for this: it is better the devil you know than what we do not know (better the devil we know ...). This may not be the reason to vote for the current government. That would not be a conscious vote. The challenge is to see the extent to which voting in the current government can be a vote for change and that, interestingly, vote for the opposition may be a vote for continuity! This requires thinking beyond the electioneering game to confuse people with slogans.
Frelimo (MDM and it aligns the same pitch) promises real change. It's a new generation (young, educated and without outbursts of arrogance that he thinks that the people owe him something). Say it is the continuity and change is perfectly consistent in these circumstances. Nyusi, in the specific case of Frelimo, represents a major disruption of generation within his party. If he knows how to make the best use of this time of change (continuity) and capitalize all the experience in government that his party has can do miracles. The only one who dares to him he is not doing better than Guebuza, which in my opinion would not be tragic because Guebuza did much, if not more than their predecessors (even if they are from different eras). And as I wrote above, the most that can be expected from a change of government is not to be consumed by their own need to adapt and be able to maintain the level, thus ensuring the continuity that now criticizes in his opponents. Here also the decision seems easy to me. Who wants real change should not get carried away by the electoral arguments. There can be changes in the continuity as well as can be continuity in change. This is not for those who use the vote as an expression of protest. Then change issue does not arise.
The main problem, however, is the individual responsibility. Mozambique is not as it is only the fault of their rulers. Is as it is also the fault of its citizens. Are we doing Sorna at work; we who have soiled the streets; we pay bribes to everything public official; are we that we put this more wedges that; are we as members and party left the opportunists who define the political agenda; we who applaud when a political party takes up arms and attack the state that gave you the right to complain; us who miss our civic responsibility leaving us lead by emotions rather than cultivate the habit of coldly analyze national affairs; we who applaud when our national teams lose instead of giving them the care they deserve. In these circumstances, vote for the current government or the opposition will not be useful unless it is accompanied by a commitment to be better citizens. The countries of the world that are well deserved better politicians because through its civic engagement meant that they strove increasingly in the public service. Only authoritarian regimes (such as Chinese or Cuban for a while) is offering the well-being of the tray. In a democracy we have to demand and required to asumindo greater responsibility. And not just at election time, although this is a crucial moment.
So use the vote as a way of penalizing others for our own civic incompetence is a clear sign of lack of maturity. Who votes against a government because it did nothing for it reveals, in most cases, it is the main culprit for their circumstances. Also, you do not vote against an incompetent government by simple fear of the unknown also shows a lack of maturity. In philosophy there is an idea that has the name of moral luck. Was introduced by a British philosopher Bernard Williams name to account for a situation where someone is penalized harshly for something essentially random. Two people, for example, go to a spree and get drunk. Come out of the spree and each one takes his car and drives. An if-plating and deadly hits a person. Another well-plating, but not run over anyone. Both people drove drunk, but that which is mortally hit that will have a hard punishment. Nothing justifies the killing of a human being hit in terms of drinking. It is lack of accountability. But it takes luck to make it happen ourselves. And you need luck for that not to happen to us. Often when we penalize a government for mistakes that only he could have committed we are, at bottom, the reward for "default" moral lucky. Are no better. Were just lucky they did not hit anyone although they may also have driven drunk ...

But here I'm already in last campaign, so I end with vote of a conscious vote.(Dr.Elisio Macamo)