Radio
Mozambique (RM), which should be, in view of the number of customers it has,
the most important media organization in the country, is, for me, a very
interesting case journalistically. Should be, MRI, the body of information,
almost crystalline form, has, in material terms, two editorial lines: one,
applied and applicable to the vast majority of their hosted several journalists
in their newsrooms, all in country and other applied and apply to your two
correspondents abroad, this time Faustino
Church in Blantyre
(Malawi ), and Gabriel
Mussavale in Pretoria (South Africa ).
But
why this way of seeing things?
"The
day I nominate myself correspondent in Malawi
or South Africa ,
I will be a happy professional, because now I will apply all that, as a
journalist, do not leave me here," he told me a few days ago, a senior
journalist of MRI, one just kidding but seriously.
The Mozambique Channel weekly newspaper is no less
"interesting" in terms of news production, at least from the material
point of view: for this publication, only one extreme, one that, as far as it
seems to me, that favors or promotes the image of right opposition party, or
which is negative for the government, can gain status news. It's easy to
justify himself by saying that "news is what goes wrong rather than what
is going well," but does not seem to believe me hit, the readers, that the
Government only spoils, never does well, never sees, is always out rails, etc..
I do not, it should be clear that a newspaper make government propaganda, but
what is positive and fit the basic criteria of newsworthiness, it might not be
bad after journalistically, perhaps even the "bad" follow these
examples the ...
MRI,
being public, worries me too. The Constitution itself up care, having in mind
its urgency for all of us to give a guarantee of independence to all its
employees, at least from the point of nominal, clear view. Still though, as to
what cogito on the Mozambique Channel , Good
Fernando Veloso coibirá not to "dispel equiívocos" ...
The
recurring question, at least in the circles of media studies, "why the
news are like?", Is actually an attempt at explanation same as I describe
above situations.
Nelson
Teasing with support Productions thinkers such as Michael Schudson and Gaye
Tuchman, summarized the discussion of the theory explaining the news in seven
"theories" which try to present the following with the help of no
less quoted researcher Jorge Pedro Sousa:
. 1
Theory mirror within which the news is seen as the mirror of reality, as the
professional ideology of the journalist;
. 2
Theory of personnel action or gatekeeper, whereby the result of the selection
of news events, based, above all, the particular choices of each selector
journalist [of events that must be processed in news];
3.
Organizational theory, which argues that news result of organizational
limitations that are "manufactured", among which stand out the
hierarchies, forms of socialization [professional], the acculturation of
journalists [provenance d] the resources financial that body and its editorial
line;
4.
Theory of political action in the wake of which the news is
"dissonant" of reality, because their "manufacturers" have
no autonomy and are subject to ideological control, which makes them act as
"an instrument at the service of the ruling class and power "; some
advocates of this theory say that the majority of journalists
"leftist" news tend to favor a "liberal" view of the world;
. 5
structuralist theory, which states that the news is socially constructed product
that reproduces the dominant ideology, legitimizing, with it, the status quo;
6
constructionist theory, one that is considered by many thinkers / scholars of
media as the "most elaborate", argues that stories are stories that
result from a process of construction -. Linguistic, organizational, social and
cultural - and therefore can not be seen as the mirror of reality, they are,
first of all, "discursive nonfiction articles" of reality;
7.
Interactionist theory, to which the news should be seen as a process of
perception, selection and processing of events in news, under the pressure of
time, by a group of professionals "relatively autonomous and empowered,
which shares a common culture ". Here, journalists are seen not as passive
observers but as active observers as active participants in the construction
process of reality.
Anyway,
I end with a confession and a question: "Agramo maningue" the news!
And what would we do if there was no news? (Ercinio Salema)
0 comentários:
Post a Comment