Mozambique’s
Central Office for the Fight Against Corruption (GCCC) has confirmed serious
allegations of illegal exports of wood and evasion of taxes by two companies
owned by Chinese citizens in the northern province of Cabo Delgado.The GCCC was
alerted to these crimes by a British-based NGO, the Environmental Investigation
Agency (EIA), which looked at the figures from both the Mozambican and Chinese
ends of the timber trade and spotted enormous discrepancies. The imports of
Mozambican timber declared in China
massively exceed the exports declared in Mozambique.According to the EIA
report, in 2012 China
recorded imports of wood (logs and sawn wood) of 450,000 cubic metres. Yet for
the same year Mozambique
recorded exports of wood of 260,385 cubic metres, not merely to China but to the entire world.
When the Chinese
figures are broken down, 323,000 cubic metres of the wood imports from Mozambique are
logs. The total exports of logs in the Mozambican records are just 41,543 cubic
metres.Discrepancies on this scale cannot be dismissed as mathematical or
accounting mistakes. They indicate that hundreds of thousands of cubic metres
of wood were exported illegally to China in 2012, mostly in the form of
unprocessed logs.A press release from the GCCC said that prosecutors
investigated the allegations against the companies Mozambique First
International Development Ltd (Mofid) and Senlian International Investment
Corporation in Mozambique Ltd, and found strong evidence that both were involved
in smuggling precious hardwoods.One of the companies (the GCCC does not specify
which) exported almost 6,400 cubic metres of wood, in the form of logs, planks
and boards in 2011 and 2012 without possessing the necessary authorisations
from the Mozambican authorities.The second company, between 2007 and 2009,
exported over 3,800 cubic metres of blackwood (pau preto) logs without paying
the taxes owing. Furthermore, first class hardwoods should never be exported as
logs, but only after processing.Under the Mozambican definition, these acts do
not constitute crimes of corruption. But they do fall under the category of
administrative infractions and tax offences. The GCCC has thus informed the
Cabo Delgado Provincial Directorate of Agriculture and the Mozambique Tax
Authority (AT) so that the cases “may be dealt with appropriately”. The GCCC
promises that the Public Prosecutor’s Office will follow these cases.But the
GCCC could find no evidence that the Mozambican citizens named in the EIA
report had any holdings in the two companies. Delicately, the release declines
to mention who these citizens are – but anyone who bothers to look up the EIA
report will find that the Mozambicans named as supposedly involved in timber
smuggling are Agriculture Minister Jose Pacheco and the former governor of Tete
province, Tomas Mandlate.The allegations against Pacheco were always very
flimsy, amounting to no more than boasts by one of the owners of MOFID, Liu
Chaoying, that he had close relations with the minister.
EIA investigators,
posing as clients, talked to Liu, who told them that he could export large
quantities of hardwoods Liu claimed close connections with Pacheco, claiming
“me and him are like brothers”, describing him as “a friend”, and alleging that
when the Minister “needs money, he has come looking for me”.Such claims of close ties with Pacheco may only be the idle boast of a crooked
businessman trying to impress someone he believes to be a client. Pacheco
roundly denied the allegations.As for Mandlate, EIA investigators say they met
him at the home of a man named Xu in Pemba in
September 2012. Xu is a senior official in the second company, Senlian. Mandlate
was staying at Xu’s house during the Frelimo Tenth Congress held in Pemba during that month. According to the report,
Mandlate claimed that his role is “to help the company solve some problems”.Xu
supposedly said that Mandlate “takes care of the liaison work, such as export
quotas, and forest concession permits”, for which the Chinese company paid him
a salary and gave him a share of the company.But Senlian ran into trouble in April 2012, when 34 of its containers full of
illegal logs were seized, resulting in large fines and forcing Senlian to
suspend log exports for the rest of the year. Nonetheless, Xu hoped that
Mandlate would smooth the way to resuming illegal exports. “He will sort it out
for me next year”, he claimed.Mandlate strongly denied any involvement with Xu
in the illegal timber trade. And if he was indeed given a share in Senlian, it
was not registeredBut the question of whether Mozambican officials held shares
in Mofid or Senlian is irrelevant. The main accusation against Pacheco and
Mandlate in the EIA report is not that they were shareholders, but that they
facilitated illegal exports. The
GCCC release does not tackle this allegation.