Testifying
for the second day, during the trial of 19 people charged with crimes arising
from the scandal of Mozambique’s “hidden debts”, businessman Bruno Langa opted
to keep his mouth shut. Interrogated by the Mozambique Bar Association (OAM),
which is assisting the Public Prosecutor’s Office, Langa simply refused to
answer any questions. The OAM asked him 27 questions, and to each of them Langa
replied “I shall not answer the question”.
The OAM
asked about his business training and experience: what was there in his
experience which led the Abu Dhabi based group, Privinvest, to appoint him as a
consultant on its project to provide protection to the Mozambican Exclusive
Economic Zone?
The
prosecution believe that Privinvest was interested in Langa, not because of any
business acumen, but because of his personal contacts.
For Langa is a close
friend of Ndambi Guebuza, the oldest son of former President, Armando Guebuza,
and this connection was used to bring the Privinvest project to the notice of
the then President.
Langa signed his consultant’s contract with Privinvest in
January 2012, and on 25 March 2013, he was paid what is politely called a “fee”
of 8.5 million US dollars into the account he had opened at First Gulf Bank in
Abi Dhabi. What services had Langa actually provided for Privinvest in the 14
months between January 2012 and March 2013?, asked the OAM. But answer came
there none. The 8.5 million dollars entered Langa’s account just four days
after the bank Credit Suisse had sent 327.9 million dollars to Privinvest.
Asked to comment on this interesting coincidence, Langa was, of course, silent.
The
Credit Suisse millions were money paid under the contract with Proindicus, the
first of three fraudulent, security-related Mozambican companies that are at
the heart of the “hidden debts” scandal. One of the peculiarities of this
contract is that the money was not sent directly to Proindicus, but to
Privinvest, which was the sole contractor for the three fraudulent companies.
Privinvest than sent patrol boats and other assets to Mozambique which an
independent audit later discovered had been grossly overvalued
The OAM
asked Langa if he had paid any income tax on the money deposited in his Abu
Dhabi account, or even declared this income to the Mozambican Tax Authority
(AT). “Did you not feel you were involved in something that damaged
Mozambique?”, the OAM asked. Would he pay any money back to the Mozambican
state? To all these questions, the answers were a sepulchral silence. The
judge, Efigenio Baptista, said that Langa was within his rights not to answer
questions, “but when defendants do answer, they help the court take its
decisions”.
He added
that when it comes to sentencing, one of the mitigating factors that courts
take into account is confession. A defendant who admits his crimes is unlikely
to receive the maximum sentence, Baptista remarked. This did not persuade Langa
to be much more forthcoming. Under questioning from the defence lawyers, he
replied to most of them with the one word “no”. Did he know his fellow defendants?
No. Had he formed a group with them? No. Did a certain email address belong to
him?
No.