"IF the project (the
creation of autonomous regions) is not approved in Parliament, who will have
problems is my brother, President Nyusi that will not get govern, because the
crowds who saw in my rallies will do demonstrations," in Afonso Dhlakama
moments after the last meeting with the President, Filipe Jacinto Nyusi."If
Frelimo (MPs) have not approved our project of creation of the autonomous
regions, there remains in nothing but expel the police, prosecutors, military
and we appoint the prime minister to those regions", in Antonio Muchanga
on TV Miramar.Two speeches, one of the "father" of democracy and
other "brother" of democracy in Mozambique. Are statements that leave no
room for doubt as to the concept of democracy to these figures. Speeches that
are no more than the manifestation of the desire for access to power at any
price. We are therefore before the reissue of incongruous speeches and arson of
two of the main "parladores" of renamistas hosts. We
are once more before two political speeches extortion professionals.The
speeches of these two figures seem to indicate that the mentors of the project
on such famous of "autonomous regions" - which is already famous
before even exist, they know they will be chumbando. And in an attempt to avoid
such a lead, unfold in pronouncements that are actually pointed knives to
throats of the deputies of the majority bench.Many have said (me included) that
victory in general elections is a national. There is local. Not
district. Is not provincial. Many have said that this is because our electoral
system defined it. This is so because our parent law, the Constitution, the
states. I understand that there is willingness to change. It is a right for
anyone. However, such a change may not
result especially of an electoral process just performed.Societies evolve as a
natural result of the claims of its people. Not necessarily because this
or that other won or lost an election. By this I mean that a proposal of the
type that Renamo want to display may come from the Government of the day,
political parties, civil society and / or other actors that represent a
considerable part of the population of Mozambique and can be presented in
situations "normal". In moments that have not
been born immediately after political crises an electoral process.I would like
to draw attention to whom I "read" to the following: if the election
results compulsarmos find situations where Frelimo won in the district
"y" and the district "z", the province "wins" by
Renamo. Will, following the logic renamista Frelimo should propose the creation
of "their autonomous region" within the "autonomous region"
Renamo. Another hypothetical example: imagine that the MDM won, in total, the
province of Inhambane, but Frelimo won in four districts (in overall terms). As
we were following the logic of Renamo?
One of the major battles of
Frelimo, first as a guerrilla movement and then as a political party, after the
proclamation of national independence, was the promotion and defense of
national unity. A vital vision for the country defined and defended in order to counter
the colonizer's strategy, which was to divide and rule. Who does not remember
the philosophy (of the colonizer), who made history that, for example, matswas
were considered inferior to vatsongas, the sixes were considered inferior to
ndaus, the varongas were considered superior compared to vatchangas, the
Makonde were considered inferior to emakwas, etc. Mozambique,
with a single country with various ethnic groups, one can not
"afford" to create conditions for that among these ethnic groups
there are the upper and the lower.Although we do not know the essence of the
project of the famous "autonomous regions" Renamo, I'm afraid its
creation, in fact the division of the country, will promote the resurgence of
tribalism. Moreover, the promotion of tribalism was dominant note during the
last election campaign, with the protagonists Renamo parties and the MDGs.(Marcelinosilva
in facebbok)
0 comentários:
Post a Comment