The Constitutional
Council, Mozambique’s highest body in matters of constitutional law, on Tuesday
declared that the government guarantees for the loans granted to the fraudulent
companies Proindicus and MAM (Mozambique Asset Management) are null and void.Three
companies, all set up on the imitative of officials in the State Security and
Intelligence (SISE), obtained loans of over two billion US dollars, in 2013 and
2014 from the banks Credit Suisse and VTB of Russia, on the strength of
guarantees given by the previous government, headed by the then President
Armando Guebuza.
The Constitutional
Council declared the guarantees for the third company, Ematum (Mozambique Tuna
Company), null and void in June2019 and the arguments used in the new ruling
are broadly identical to those in the Ematum ruling.The Council was reacting to
a petition of 2,000 citizens asking the Council to declare the Proindicus and
MAM guarantees as unconstitutional and illegal. The petitioners in particular
wanted the Council to declare unconstitutional the resolution passed by the
country’s parliament, the Assembly of the Republic, published in December 2017,
which approved the General State Account for 2015.In the view of the
petitioners the mention of the Proindicus and MAM loans in the 2015 State
Account gave them retrospective validation (although the government, at the
time, claimed that the mention of the guarantees merely acknowledged their
existence, and said nothing about their validity).The Constitutional Council
agreed with the petitioners that, in granting the loan guarantees the
government violated both the 2013 and 2014 budget laws and the Constitution
itself. Every year, the budget law puts a ceiling on the guarantees that can be
granted by the government. The guarantees for Proindicus, Ematum and MAM
smashed through this ceiling – as was acknowledged by the Commission of Inquiry
set up by the Assembly to investigate the matter.
The guarantees for the
loans to Proindicus (622 million dollars) and to MAM (535 million dollars)
dated from 2013 and 2014 respectively, but were not included in the General
State Accounts for those years, and were therefore not known by the
Administrative Tribunal, the body that supervises the legality of public
expenditure. The government never explained this omission, but merely said it
included the guarantees in the 2015 General State Account “for purposes of
regularisation”.Since the loan guarantees exceeded the limits set in the 2013
and 2014 budget laws, the only way to approve them would have been to request
authorisation from the Assembly. Not only was no such request ever made, but
the Proindicus and MAM loans were kept secret from the Assembly, from the
public, and from the government’s foreign partners – with serious consequences.When
the full extent of the loans became known, in April 2016, the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) accused the government of concealing the country’s true
foreign debt situation, and suspended its programme with Mozambique. The 14
donors who had given part of their aid to Mozambique in the form of direct
support to the state budget suspended all further disbursements. They have
never resumed.
The Constitutional
Council had no doubt that the Guebuza government had violated the budget laws
in two succeeding years, and also the clause in the Constitution which states
that only the Assembly may grant loans for a period in excess of one financial
year.Furthermore, the 2012 Law on the State Financial Management System
(SISTAFE) states that no expenditure can be ordered or undertaken unless it is
included in the state budget and is justified in terms of efficiency and
effectiveness. Nothing of the sort happened with the Proindicus, Ematum and MAM
loan guarantees.The Constitutional Council concluded that the government
“completely disrespected the Constitution and the law” in contracting the
Proindicus and MAM loans and issuing the guarantees. Those government decisions
had been invalid right from the start.The Council thus, as it had done with
Ematum last year, declared all acts concerning the Proindicus and MAM loans and
guarantees null and void “with all the legal consequences”.
In other words, any
attempt by the government to repay those loans will be illegal.
However, it should be
noted that the government has ignored last year’s Council ruling on the Ematum
loan, and has continued to make interest payments to the ex-Ematum bondholders.An
agreement with those bondholders was reached by the Finance Ministry in May
2019, just five days before the Council’s ruling on Ematum. The ruling rendered
that agreement entirely illegal, but the government made a first payment under
the May 2019 agreement, of 112.5 million dollars, in March of this year.
0 comentários:
Post a Comment