![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitN4XavQRBMUyBLaziORxDspCoONg_nxJqtC-w4h4rvrQk1V5TltvVfwBoe5PibMSi6HAjl4zpFzE25f95zbNc78l8AcYYULnJV5_bB8L2tKiNh8HXJAbIBoU1cTzKcyX1QEGk6cK6q2xW/s1600/vt1.jpg)
“In breach of the terms of the loan
agreement and government guarantee, MAM and the Republic have failed to make
these payments, and any other sums, so that the VTB has consequently suffered
damages and losses,” the Russian bank’s lawyers argued. After the November
warning, lawyers acting for the Mozambican state responded on January 6,
stating that the Mozambique “did not accept that MAM’s government guarantee was
valid, binding and applicable”, and that they had several reasons to believe
that this was the case.
In addition to the outstanding amounts
of US$817.5 million plus interest on late payments, the VTB also demands a
statement from the Mozambican state confirming that the loan of US$545 million
(€497.9 million) to MAM is “legal , binding and applicable”, and that the same
applies to the state guarantee issued at the time. The term ‘hidden debts’
relates to loans of around US$2.2 billion (two billion Euros) contracted
between 2013 and 2014 in the form of credit with the British branches of
investment banks Credit Suisse and VTB by state-owned Mozambican companies
Proindicus, Ematum and MAM. The loans were guaranteed by the Mozambican
government of the time, without the knowledge either of parliament or the
country’s Administrative Tribunal.
ALSO READ: Mozambique
queried $535 million loan guarantee, VTB says in court filing
Russia’s VTB Sues
Mozambique State Firm at Center of $2B Debt Scandal
Russia’s VTB,
Mozambique president discuss debt restructure
Mozambique: President
meets executives from VTB, Rosoboronexport and Uralkali in Sochi, Russia
0 comentários:
Post a Comment