Friday, March 9, 2012

Missel despair

When the forces of Muammar Qaddafi used for the first time, during the conflict with the rebels, a Scud missile, NATO Colonel Roland Lavoie, described the act as a sign of desperation of the regime of Gaddafi: "Our assessment is that Gaddafi's regime is no longer effective operational capability. You can certainly throw dishes against the wall to make a little noise, but we believe can generate a significant effect operating. "
It seems to me to be what is happening in Frelimo, judging by the behavior of its leadership, especially by their pronouncements. It is that last year, the Head of State, while Frelimo President Armando Guebuza, said most of the critics who worked for the silence. It was a rich year in response to critics than results of solutions of the problems that are raised by these critics. It was more than whining solver of the concerns of Mozambicans.
Doing a search easily concludes that over the past two years, Guebuza has invested more in the responses by actions than by words. Have resorted to nicknaming those who criticize the expressions as "apostles of doom", "talkative", "intriguers," "incompetent," "marginal," "impatient," "those who want to see everything done today"; "they want to see all happening simultaneously across our Mozambique," those who "ignore the processes that go beyond our capacity resources when their bids are not accomplished, make use of articles detrimental to national unity, harmony and coexistence among Mozambicans, and even speak of political will of the Frelimo government, "who" suffer from internal conflicts, "among others.
Today, because the criticism has not only come from outside but from within the party, the president of Frelimo, also turned into the party, prompting critics inside the party to "the risk to marginalize, to abandon their collective , his comrades, the decisions of the organs, to reproduce their own ideas, thinking they are speaking on behalf "of the party.
More: Guebuza believes that "some want to appear as being better than the actual Frelimo". However, does not refer to any names of those "some", interestingly, members and their subordinates in the party that he is the epitome. This statement, which appears in the style of "gossip", gives the impression that the Frelimo frontality that is said to have existed has been replaced by "say ..." that is, more gossip than forthright.
It is worrying for a party the size of Frelimo, when their president makes public statements reveal that it supports the bases of gossip, instead of using the means at its disposal to attract attention to their subordinates to the need to curb his temper in his public appearances.
Guebuza's public pronouncements are a clear sign that he has no power to impose order within the party. They are a sign of desperation, a statement that he lost control of the party agenda and his comrades.
Also, Guebuza not only realized later that the party is so great that not only fits in your hands but also realized belatedly that some of his buddies are so powerful than he. Also realize that your effort and intention monarchy was not only fruitless but also divided the party into wings.
Their public statements that "some want to suggest that there are two or more Frelimos, is understandable. They are trying to understand an event that is to go and who will turn 50 years, from personal experience, limited and not necessarily look at this movement, which is only moving when its members have united and work for the same purpose "are confirming that there are in fact split in the party.(L.Mabunda)

0 comentários:

Post a Comment